oops, qfe is b74

I lied... (not intentionally, I got confused.) The qfe GLDv3 port is in b74, not b73. Sorry!

Comments

Unknown said…
Hi, with those few commands I makeGLDv3 capable qfe NIC:

modunload -i "id of qfe"

cp /kernel/drv/sparcv9/hme /kernel/drv/sparcv9/qfe

modload qfe

devfsadm -C

now qfe seems to work with GLDv3 features.
October 11, 2007 at 7:47 AM
Unknown said…
That should work, though there are some details that you may be overlooking, which *could* cause problems (namely the ddi_driver_name() is not quite right, in the driver binary.)

But, yes, qfe is nearly 100% the same code as hme, and mostly the qfe changes just make it work by directly calling into the hme driver. (There are packaging changes, of course.)
October 11, 2007 at 8:30 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Hand May Be Forced

Well, as you may have read , Oracle has decided that at some point very soon, we're going to lose normal regular access to the source code for OS/Net. (I.e. the Solaris kernel and supporting programs.) While I would have vastly preferred for Illumos to have a cooperative and collaborative relationship with Oracle , it appears that Oracle doesn't value this. In fact, the exact words were from the management at Oracle were as follows: Solaris is not something we outsource to others, it is not the assembly of someone else’s technology, and it is not a sustaining-only product. While I understand the need to own the technology, there are few things that could be stated that show a stronger NIH attitude than this. Its unlikely that there will ever be a way for Oracle and the greater community to have a collaborative relationship. This is a dark day for OpenSolaris -- its effectively dead now. (Its parent, Solaris, lives on however.) How unfortunate. For Oracle that is.
Read more

GNU grep - A Cautionary Tale About GPLv3

My company, DEY Storage Systems , is in the process of creating a new product around the illumos operating system.  As you might imagine, this product includes a variety of open and proprietary source code.  The product itself is not delivered as a separate executable, but as a complete product.  We don't permit our customers to crack it open, both from the sense of protecting our IP, but also to protect our support and release engineering organizations -- our software releases consist only of a single file and we don't supply tools or source for other parties to modify that file. One of the pieces that we wanted to integrate into the tree is an excellent little piece of software called Zookeeper , produced by the Apache organization.  Like illumos, Zookeeper has a nice non-viral copyleft license, which makes it nice for integration into our product. However, I discovered that as part of our integration, one of my engineers had decided to integrate GNU grep.  Why? Becaus
Read more

TLS close-notify .... what were they thinking?

Close-Notify Idiocy? TLS (and presumably SSL) require that implementations send a special disconnect message, "close-notify", when closing a connection.  The precise language (from TLS v1.2) reads: The client and the server must share knowledge that the connection is ending in order to avoid a truncation attack. Either party may initiate the exchange of closing messages.  close_notify  This message notifies the recipient that the sender will not send any more messages on this connection. Note that as of TLS 1.1, failure to properly close a connection no longer requires that a session not be resumed. This is a change from TLS 1.0 to conform with widespread implementation practice.  Either party may initiate a close by sending a close_notify alert. Any data received after a closure alert is ignored.  Unless some other fatal alert has been transmitted, each party is required to send a close_notify alert before closing the write side of the connection.
Read more